This truly fascinating discovery of sound waves
involved in the Big Bang almost suggests a vision of dancing stars, arranging
galaxies in the infinite, black sky. But actually, it is not necessary to imagine
this, because it is possible to listen to that sound in reality. In fact, a
recorded simulation of that primordial sound is available on the internet for
all of us to listen to, and this has been possible thanks to a child’s
curiosity (Cramer, 2004).
It was a normal day when John G. Cramer,
professor of physics at the University of Washington in Seattle,
received an email from Daniel’s mom. They happened to read an article entitled
“BOOMERanG and the Sound of the Big Bang,”
written by the professor, describing a recording of the sound of the Big Bang,
based on temperature measurements, when the universe was 376,000 years old
(Cramer, 2004). The 11-year-old child, Daniel, was wondering if that sound recording
was available to be heard, since he was about to present a science project at
school, with the Big Bang as his topic. Professor Cramer was obliged to say the
recording was not available; however, this curiosity moved him to think about
how to produce such a recording (Cramer, 2004).
Fascinated by this idea, Professor Cramer started working
on it and, through his skilled knowledge of the software Mathematica and some
calculations, he was able to convert the cosmic background radiation in a
musical file, .wav format. When he first played the recording simulation, his
two dogs started to bark with agitation. Then they were suddenly calm again as
soon as they realized nothing serious was happening: just a part from the sound
of the Big Bang playing in the sub-woofer (Cramer, 2004).
In detail, Professor Cramer had to make some
adjustments: “The actual Big Bang frequencies, which had wavelengths that were
some fraction of the size of the universe at that time, were far too low in
frequency to be audible to humans” (Cramer, 2004). So, he had to boost the
original frequencies upward by a huge factor through his dedicated program. To
produce the sound, Professor Cramer took data from NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave
Anisotropy Probe, and then he had to scale the frequencies 100,000 billion
billion times (Chown, 2003). Furthermore, with the purpose of making the
recording simulation audible to humans, the multiply peaked frequency spectrum was
reduced to a monaural sound wave. According to the analysis, the radiations dropped
to 60% intensity before and after the peak itself. Hence, the simulation
prepared by Professor Cramer covers in 100 seconds a total period of 760,000
years of evolution of the universe, making it possible to hear the Big Bang
sound with the decreasing frequencies (Cramer, 2004).
Basically, the sound of the Big Bang is like a legato sound, starting with a peak in a higher pitch, descending little by little to lower frequencies, like if the expanding universe becomes a bass instrument during the time of the entire radiation emission (Cramer, 2004). Actually, the radiation recording demonstrates that the matter that filled the universe, shortly after the Big Bang, was squeezed and stretched, and the compressed regions were heated, and the rarefied zones were cooled (Chown, 2003). The science writer Marcus Chown defined the Big Bang sound as “more like a deep hum than a bang.” Professor Cramer stated, “The sound is rather like a large jet plane flying 100 feet above your house in the middle of the night” (Chown, 2003), something like chromatically descending a couple of octaves.
Basically, the sound of the Big Bang is like a legato sound, starting with a peak in a higher pitch, descending little by little to lower frequencies, like if the expanding universe becomes a bass instrument during the time of the entire radiation emission (Cramer, 2004). Actually, the radiation recording demonstrates that the matter that filled the universe, shortly after the Big Bang, was squeezed and stretched, and the compressed regions were heated, and the rarefied zones were cooled (Chown, 2003). The science writer Marcus Chown defined the Big Bang sound as “more like a deep hum than a bang.” Professor Cramer stated, “The sound is rather like a large jet plane flying 100 feet above your house in the middle of the night” (Chown, 2003), something like chromatically descending a couple of octaves.
Two years before, in a previous article, Professor
Cramer wrote that the cosmic background radiation was first detected in 1960
and then measured with increased precision by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE)
satellite in 1990. The primordial sound waves that were present at the time of
the Big Bang produced processes of compression and rarefaction, with some
regions being slightly hotter or colder than others (Cramer, 2001). In
particular, two other experiments describe how the Big Bang’s vibrations
generated and left their imprint on the matter-bound photons. As explained by the
science writer Ron Cowen, “Whenever gravity caused matter to compress, the
pressure exerted by the trapped photons offered resistance. The tug-of-war
between gravity and radiation pressure generated acoustic oscillations” (Cowen,
2001).
In other words, not only does the sound of the
universe confirm the Big Bang, but those waves also influenced the clustering
of galaxies (Burnham, 2005). This is particularly important because, despite
its great popularity, the Big Bang theory presents some contradiction in the
observations, related to the inflation field, the dark matter, and the dark
energy field. These are three hypothetical entities, not yet scientifically
confirmed by evidence (Lerner, 2003). Theorists are working hard to try to
confirm their assumptions. For example, with the help of the South Pole
Telescope, built to detect, observe, and measure the cosmic microwave
radiations, cosmologists have also found light waves scattered off the
pulsating matter and aligned into bands of polarized light, in full
confirmation of the Big Bang echo (Moyer, 2003).
Furthermore, two different research teams, the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the 2 Degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey
(2dFGRS), have common findings on microwave radiations, which have been found
at the expected location, at about 500 million light-years. Also, they
identified the remnant glow of the Big Bang and ripples with sound waves
emitted shortly after it. This shows that the concordant picture scientists
have of the universe is hanging together extremely well (Burnham, 2005).
Since the beginning of the comic expansion, the
pattern of ripples was originally set when the matter started to get
distributed in regions because of the quantum effects, as hypothesized by the
scientists. The squeezing of this matter, fluctuating and aggregating, due to
the gravity influence, generated the oscillations of sound waves, which are
comparable to the ringing of a bell (Burnham, 2005). These waves still pervade
the universe today as a stretched version of the first ones. Actually, the two
research teams, through the examination of 267,000 galaxies’ spacial position,
found this pattern “matches the expected distances from the centers to the
edges of acoustic ripples that grew as space expanded,” according to SDSS
astronomer Daniel Eisenstein of the University of Arizona, Tucson (Burnham,
2005).
Another independent study conducted in Arlington,
Virginia, confirmed the association between the Big Bang, the microwave
radiation, and the ripples generated just as a musical instrument would produce
sound waves of characteristic frequencies. The Cosmic Background Imager (CBI)
is a telescope placed in the Acatama Desert of Chile. The extremely sensitive
technology has been able to capture higher overtones and find other sound
peaks. This confirms the previous theories and the model of the universe in
which “photons from the early universe scatter off electrons in hot gas in
clusters of galaxies closer to Earth, distorting the cosmic background
radiation,” says Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at the University of Pennsylvania
in Philadelphia (Seife, 2002).
Hence, those first sound waves that impacted photons
have been travelling through the universe all along, carrying important
information about the Big Bang and constituting the cosmic microwave background.
Based on that, and after Professor Cramer’s first Big Bang sound recording,
from Wilkinson
Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) measurements in 2003, a new research team of
astronomers has been established with the purpose of getting new measurements
through a satellite mission (Cramer, 2013). He writes:
The Planck Collaboration, consisting of about 278
authors from 107 institutions, 17 of which are in the USA, working with the
European Space Agency, has designed, constructed, launched, and operated the
Planck satellite mission to study the CMB. Planck was launched on May 14, 2009.
It masses 1900 kg, cost 0.7 billion Euros, and has collected high resolution
data of the CMB over many months of operation.
This impressive team produced excellent results. In
three years of data collecting and analysis, the Planck Collaboration has
worked to appropriately filter the microwave radiations in order to carefully exclude
interferences caused by other radio sources coming from this galaxy, the Milky
Way, and from galactic dust. The more accurate angular variations, provided by
the Planck satellite measurement system, allowed the scientists to discover
that the previous WMAP analysis, made in 2003, was missing a significant high-frequency
structure in the cosmic microwave background (Cramer, 2013).
The research has shown convincingly that the universe
is flat, its expansion is slower, and it is a bit older than the previous
calculation. Data show there is more normal matter, cold dark matter, and less
dark energy than what was seen in the WMAP analysis. But the most important
result shows certain anomalies regarding the cosmic microwave background,
having higher temperatures in the southern hemisphere and colder temperatures
in the northern hemisphere of the universe (Cramer, 2013). Even if the reason
for such anomaly is basically unknown, the team is formulating a hypothesis that
the cold spot could be an enormous vacuum containing almost no stars, galaxies
or gas (Cramer, 2013).
This last consideration, curiously, seems to state
that where there is no music, there is nothing else. Certainly, the connection
between music and the origin of the universe is truly fascinating, especially
considering its impact on galaxies’ formation. The idea that the original
cosmic creation has a pattern, a musical-mathematical-physical order for all
matter and energy distribution, is very interesting because it suggests that
existence is not casual. In fact, there is great enthusiasm among researchers
at this point. Thanks to the new measurement systems and technologies, they are
close to overlapping the results and making valid comparisons among the
findings. “This will be particularly fun,” Tegmark said (Seife, 2002).
References
Burnham, R.
(2005, 04). Big bang sound waves influenced the clustering of galaxies. Astronomy,
33, 22. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215929132?accountid=27927
Chown, M.
(2003, Nov). Forget the big bang, tune into the big hum. New Scientist, 180, 16. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200451816?accountid=27927
Cowen, R.
(2001, Apr 28). Sounds of the universe confirm big bang. Science News, 159, 261. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/197573889?accountid=27927
Cramer, J.
G. (2001, 01). BOOMERanG and the sound of the big bang. Analog Science Fiction & Fact, 121, 73-75. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/215355509?accountid=27927
Cramer, J.
G. (2004, 05). THE SOUND OF THE BIG BANG. Analog
Science Fiction & Fact, 124, 66-69. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/1404761078?accountid=27927
Cramer, J.
G. (2013, 10). PLANCK: “BIG BANG SOUND” IN HIGH FIDELITY. Analog Science Fiction & Fact, 133, 51-53. Retrieved from
Lerner, E.
J. (2003). Two world systems revisited: A comparison of plasma cosmology and
the big bang. IEEE Transactions on Plasma
Science, 31(6), 1268-1275. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/195169680?accountid=27927
Moyer, M.
(2003, 01). Strangelets in the night... dark matter revelation, big bang
confirmation and speed-of-light confusion. Popular
Science, 262, 72. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/222928020?accountid=27927
Seife, C.
(2002). Best big bang pictures show new wrinkles. Science, 296(5573), 1588-9. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/213598950?accountid=27927
I would never have thought to associate the Big Bang with music. But I love the idea of the universe coming into being with a song.
ReplyDelete